# Announcing Etherlink 7.1: a security upgrade proposal

**URL:** https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/announcing-etherlink-7-1-a-security-upgrade-proposal/7166
**Category:** Research and Development
**Created:** [August 28, 2026, 8:48am UTC](https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/announcing-etherlink-7-1-a-security-upgrade-proposal/7166 "2026-08-28T08:48:05Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JASP](https://forum.tezosagora.org/user_avatar/forum.tezosagora.org/jasp/32/2723_2.png) [@JASP](https://forum.tezosagora.org/u/JASP)
#### Post date: [August 30, 2026, 11:21am UTC](https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/announcing-etherlink-7-1-a-security-upgrade-proposal/7166/3 "2026-08-30T11:21:46Z")

</div>

GM!

Exactly. Check out my reply on this thread:

> [@Etherlink 7.0 (Ganesha): resubmission via Fast governance on Wednesday, August 19th](https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/etherlink-7-0-ganesha-resubmission-via-fast-governance-on-wednesday-august-19th/7157/8):
>
> This logic is backwards… Looking forward to the “more information” prior to the vote.

` You also say `The proposal also includes additional security improvements developed while working on the fix.` - What guarantees that no other security improvements are required? `

Less than two weeks ago I bring up the case of other security fixes being required as this was being pushed. And now it is exactly what is happening.

Voting on a proposal that is not totally clear should always be a no go; Unfortunately majority of the world is still sheep just following and reacting to whatever shows up in front of them.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/announcing-etherlink-7-1-a-security-upgrade-proposal/7166)._