One community member has produced a proposal that implements Granada, without liquidity baking:
I have read this code and I believe it to be correct and achieve the desired outcomes. I believe, to the best of my knowledge, that this is a legitimate proposal. I do not, however, know this person and I encourage the community to validate the code on their own, rather than blindly trusting my opinion.
It is now up to a baker if they would like to inject this protocol. It is my opinion that we should do this - but I’d like an implicit “second” by having another baker participate in injection.
I do still believe we should offer LB for an alternative asset. I’d be happy to help an interested party create this proposal (Otherwise, I may try to produce an asset). I’ve posted instructions for this above.
I am advocating options for this proposal, and decoupling of controversial features from common sense improvements. I am not advocating for a specific outcome by suggesting we inject these proposals - I’m only advocating that we give folks the choice.
If the two protocols described above are injected I think we’ve achieved the goal of decoupling and providing options and I feel that we are in a good place where the community of bakers can have a good faith discussion, debate and ultimately select the path forward.
