# Announcing Granada **URL:** https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/announcing-granada/3183 **Category:** Research and Development **Created:** [May 31, 2021, 1:32pm UTC](https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/announcing-granada/3183 "2021-05-31T13:32:07Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 124
### Author: ![keefertaylor](https://forum.tezosagora.org/user_avatar/forum.tezosagora.org/keefertaylor/32/486_2.png) [@keefertaylor](https://forum.tezosagora.org/u/keefertaylor) #### Post date: [June 2, 2021, 9:02pm UTC](https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/announcing-granada/3183/124 "2021-06-02T21:02:25Z")
It is my understanding that the alternative protocol presented earlier today was injected in hash [oo1SPmMcEzhLK8q2tvzfyuXtGkBkqmqWWMkyNgWNQCiVgAFTB7b](https://tzkt.io/oo1SPmMcEzhLK8q2tvzfyuXtGkBkqmqWWMkyNgWNQCiVgAFTB7b). Importantly, at this time I do not have opinions on whether bakers should / should not vote for this proposal, though I am happy that options and alternatives are being presented. I’ve written my understanding of the protocol and it’s implications here: > [@PsmarYW: Granada without liquidity baking](https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/psmaryw-granada-without-liquidity-baking/3256/6): > > It is my understanding that this proposal has been injected in [Operation oo1SPm..TB7b on tzkt.io](https://tzkt.io/oo1SPmMcEzhLK8q2tvzfyuXtGkBkqmqWWMkyNgWNQCiVgAFTB7b). This proposal was injected by baker [TezosRus](https://tzkt.io/tz1b9MYGrbN1NAxphLEsPPNT9JC7aNFc5nA4/operations/) and written by an anonymous protocol developer, based on ideas I have presented. As I’ve stated before, I think it’s important that bakers have the final say in what features they want to uptake this proposal period. I would like to see an additional asset presented for liquidity baking consideration as well (and have outlined that [here](https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/announcing-granada/3183/91)). I am open to he… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/announcing-granada/3183)._