I agree with all that you’re saying. Post-mortems cover what you’re saying as they are done after the fact and that’s all we’re asking. Further, the devs could easily get ahead of all of this and say something/anything like “hey we’re busy fixing patches we will have more info when it’s all said and done”. See how easy that is to assuage everyone’s concern with just a few words? Instead their silence is more insulting at this point as it feels like they’re too stubborn to even give us a reply that we deserve.
That sounds reasonable.
But I dunno, for me it’s all clear from first post, and somewhere below in the thread I’ve seen Boulange jumping in for more talk. Maybe it’s just me though, because I’m a techbro as well so I don’t seek too much of human interaction on things which are obvious enough. Still guess devs should take a note cuz customer is always right
That reminds me…I came here to complain too about something more important as this post got enough visibility, so here it is:
wen we get more liquidity for Hanji?
1 Like
post-mortem is indeed incoming
In the end it`s very simple math but Bakers should be aware that they are the ones holding power. If devs missbehave just starting voting NO on their proposal and ban them from making changes on the protocol.
If TEZOS is destined to succed it`s not one dev team that will make it or not happen. If one team gets banned from working on it, other people will show up to close the gap.
1 Like
