# Feedback Request for 'R' Protocol Proposal **URL:** https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/feedback-request-for-r-protocol-proposal/6559 **Category:** Research and Development **Created:** [January 7, 2025, 7:28pm UTC](https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/feedback-request-for-r-protocol-proposal/6559 "2025-01-07T19:28:59Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 76
### Author: ![nicolasochem](https://forum.tezosagora.org/user_avatar/forum.tezosagora.org/nicolasochem/32/544_2.png) [@nicolasochem](https://forum.tezosagora.org/u/nicolasochem) #### Post date: [January 23, 2025, 6:15pm UTC](https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/feedback-request-for-r-protocol-proposal/6559/76 "2025-01-23T18:15:17Z")
A quality-of-life improvement for bakers who pay delegation rewards would be the ability to direct these to an account of their choice, can we please add this to R? I wrote about it in more detail: > [@Reward Account Selection for bakers](https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/reward-account-selection-for-bakers/4828/10): > > Bringing this one back… In Oxford, there are now 3 baker parameters stored in the context: consensus key, limit\_of\_staking\_over\_baking and edge\_of\_baking\_over\_staking. Let’s add a 4th parameter, rewards\_destination, as described in the original post? Assuming Adaptive Issuance activates, this will only direct rewards from delegation, not rewards from staking which will be handled in-protocol. The arguments I initially brought up still apply. Plus: Adaptive Issuance is great for bakers becaus… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.tezosagora.org/t/feedback-request-for-r-protocol-proposal/6559)._