Quorum was met.
And a lot yay, >50%, for being specific: that means that the proposal is good in general terms but it needs to be rethinked a bit to achieve supermajority.
I really do not understand the purpouse of including Adaptative Issuance on “Oxford 2”, considering it will be impossible to activate it. Why not try to incorporate as much requirements as possible from the bakers feddback that voted no, and trying again with the new revised proposal? For example, including a proposal with a % staking more attractive for bakers like Oxlo and with all the technical bugs solved.
