A proper vote can not be made until bakers know if Qena42 will be deployed with or without UAPO.
Read Option Two from the initial post.
If approved during the exploration period, it will be implemented with UAPO
A proper vote can not be made until bakers know if Qena42 will be deployed with or without UAPO.
Read Option Two from the initial post.
If approved during the exploration period, it will be implemented with UAPO
My meaning is that it will prevent flooding our governance process with lots of low quality high noise proposals and suggestions. Itβs good that it takes some effort to get a proposal in, imho.
From what I can gather about the XZ sabotage it was more of a social engineering / trust exploitation than a sybil (flooding) attack? Or am I getting my terms wrong? Anyway, we can discuss that in a separate thread