I think it would be good to lower the number of proposals per baker in the first phase.
Like any baker can inject 3-5 different proposals. With that, we can get rid of spamming the process.
20 is the optimal number. I say this idea is not good.
It limits the system too much.
You already spammed this election with your 18 bogus proposals. Do you have nothing better to do?
I understand why you feel it is needed.
Maybe we can compromise and go for 10?
Ill find the code to change and inject it if youd like. But it would probably need to be the next cycle.
Master Number 22.
So when H rolls around we can have a second code proposal that has H + Reduce Injection Cap to 10.
And a counter proposal Increase Injections cap to 30.
Might as well provide options.
The point is to defend against robotic attacks, not human attacks like yours
Did you propose #22 for this ?
Can you link the source.
Spamming the chain with proposals will not work whether the limit is 20 or 5 per baker. If anything, this would actually encourage more comradery and cooperation between bakers.
Yes the next step of the real world onchain governance test is to attempt what is called Vote Splitting.
He finally found out how to inject a proposal and then played around with it like a little kid.
Would it also be possible to lower the bow tie limit for bakers to zero?
Rofl that’s a good one man.
You don’t like the bow tie?