Mathematical proof that LB hides a redistribution of wealth TAX & new proposal with baker reimbursement

[Haxerol]

Again, we were not talking about LB, we were talking about Arthurs example and a slight generalization to arbitrary amounts.

@murbard

Imagine two proposals:

A. Create an extra 1,000,000 tez per block, which are immediately burned.

This example and LB are two different things and we were talking about the first and not the second. I know this can be confusing and I will try to avoid such situations in the future.
You answered that:

@tezoswakenbake

Yes, anything that comes from the TEZ printing machine should go straight to bakers, so we apply baker fee. Because if is not like that, there will be a discrepancy in earnings before and after BF. Do you know what a TAX with the purpose to distribute wealth is? The TAX will happen every time something from the TEZ printing machine goes to the burning trash.

Now, lets assume a year ago the Tezos printing machine minted and burned 10^9 tez in the middle of the night without anybody noticing. A massive TAX, completely annihilating bakers inventives but luckily nobody noticed that and everything went on as before. Sadly you opened yesterday a chain explorer and find that minting and burning operations. Shockingly you have been bancrupt for a year without anybody knowing.

The truly fascinating question is, what happens if you dont tell the other bakers about this operations?
Are they like schrodingers cat both bankrupt and not bankrupt?
What happens if you interact with them?

Again, we are talking about the first thing, not the second thing!!!