This is not governance anymore, I sign up for on-chain governance, not a democracy, where property rights are expropriated, and income sources are TAXED, democracies always fails. Democracies are the tyranny of the majority, if the majority say that TF must be expropriated and DSL too, does it make it right? Does it make it a “good governance”? No right? it does not.
@murbard and @sophia are like politicians, that are brainwashing everyone in making them believe that LB proposal is a good thing, when it is not, because it contains a hidden tax, and now you want to brainwash other bakers, to think, this is the “way forward”. And is not, not like this. LP’s could still be funded if bakers are reimbursed, and we wouldn’t have a loss in rewards. But you and Arthur are so arrogant to accept you hide that tax, maybe unintentionally, but the fact is that you did put that tax there.
Arthur was the first one that jumped, when bakers were discussing about burning the coins of the TF, for the “common good” “for decentralization”. And he started saying we will be like Zimbabwe. So when the majority wants to burn TF bakers is bad, but when the majority wants to expropriate or TAX the revenue sources to ALL bakers, is good and acceptable. Give me a break with your double morality.
And yes, I want to influence bakers that they are being fooled, because that is the whole truth. You want to influence bakers too, by telling them, that it is okay to be TAXED for NO REASON, because Liquidity could still be funded by the subsidy, if trading fee is reimbursed to bakers, so they can apply the baking fee, liquidity is funded REGARDLESS. AND YES, I’m upset because I will be TAXED along with my fellow bakers. @sophia if you want to do charity do it with your own pocket, do not want to do charity with the pockets of others, you go and buy TEZ from the exchange and send it to a burning address.