Description for PtSEBUHxx will be added by a moderator
2 Likes
Where do I read on what this proposal is changing?
3 Likes
I’d be interested as well, also for the other 20 proposals that where submitted alongside Lima.
1 Like
We need to change the protocol so that one posts a bond with their proposal and it’s sacrificed if the proposal does not get a bare minimum of attention.
Disagree, everyone should be able to post a proposal without the need for a bond. After all the majority decides which one will win. Maybe instead of a bond add a proposal limit like 2 proposals per cycle to prevent spam proposals… or instead of a bond add a tx fee to post a proposal. Like 2tez, its not much but some will maybe think twice if they want to spend 10x 2xtz for 10 proposals etc
“Disagree, everyone should be able to post a proposal without the need for a bond.”
Why? It is asymmetric. They get to take advantage of everyone’s attention, which is very expensive. Why should there not be a risk associated with that if it is abused?
Wait, why a transaction fee?
I don’t think legit / well thought out proposals should have to lose a bond or pay extra, just those that abuse the system.
We can avoid giving these spam proposals attention by explicitly labeling them as “spam” on agora and other frontends.
Whenever a real proposal (with code) is injected, it propagates through the p2p network.
To show the list of protocols known by the node:
octez-admin-client list protocols
or with RPC
curl http://localhost:8732/protocols
A fake proposal with no associated code won’t show up there, so frontends can either mask it under a spam toggle, or avoid displaying it altogether. Unless I’m missing something?
1 Like
I like that in the meantime but Ideally I would not like someone’s spam or graffiti to end up on the chain in the first place. At least give spammers some friction.
