How do all the bakers here feel about the current reward split between stakers and delegators?
At the moment stakers get 2X the rewards of delegators.
[EDIT 1]
Here’s a very small poll on X to show the current community sentiment on the matter. So far looks like the opinion is fairly split.
I believe it’s quite unfair for Stakers and Bakers when compared to Delegators, who take no risks yet still receive over 7%, which is even more than what we typically earned before AI.
We should seriously consider either eliminating Delegators rewards or reducing them significantly, to about 1/10 of what Stakers/Bakers earn.
Why reward anyone who risks NOTHING? This seems like flawed Game Theory unless there’s something I’m missing. I’d be happy to hear compelling counterarguments.
P.S.: I’m aware of the Multisig/Smart contract argument. Any other perspectives?
The previous argument was that it’s not really rewarding as much as “protecting against inflation”. But with AI these arguments fall away a bit. I would be in favor of adjusting this in favor of bakers & stakers 
