triplespeak

this is ambiguous and undocumented, and forces us to deal with it.

–liquidity-baking-toggle-vote on/off/pass

can someone which of the three vote options is the one where we are against continuing or sponsoring liquidity subsidy ?

It’s documented and explained (ie: not ambiguous):
https://tezos.gitlab.io/alpha/liquidity_baking.html#toggle-vote

2 Likes

Here too:
https://tezos.gitlab.io/protocols/013_jakarta.html#liquidity-baking

1 Like

why would any software authors make this copmletely oblivious to the sod who is FORCED to pick one on the command line, instead of pasting this into the source code help text ?

“The baker has three options for this flag: Off to request ending the subsidy, On to request continuing or restarting the subsidy, and Pass to abstain.”

this marks the devs as beyond reproach, making esoteric giberish for those who payed for the privelege of holding the bag while others get paid to hasten it.